Act 2009
Book V, Title VI of the French Monetary and Financial Code
Code monétaire et financier
Issued by Traitement du renseignement et action contre les circuits financiers clandestins
Effective: 1 Feb 2009
Last amended: 26 Apr 2026
Plain-English summary
Title VI of Book V of the French Monetary and Financial Code (Code monétaire et financier) is the leading and functional code on anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in France. This provision was enacted in December 2000 and was substantially restructured in February 2009 to incorporate the directives from the European Union into the French legislation, and it continues to be revised regularly until now, with the most recent revision being the changes in April 2026 through the regulatory changes regarding the training of employees and beneficial ownership documentation. Enforced and regulated by the relevant authorities such as the ACPR and AMF, Title VI prescribes the precise due diligence, asset freezing, and suspicious transaction reporting requirements for banks, financial institutions, and insurance companies to prevent financial crimes and tax evasion.
Who it applies to
Banking · Insurance · Crypto / VDA · Real Estate · DNFBPs (Lawyers, Accountants, Dealers)
Topics
AML / CFT / Sanctions
Obligations arising from this instrument
| Obligation | Timing | Regulator | Source | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AML compliance programme and officer | Ongoing | ACPR | source | |
Within the French Monetary and Financial Code and AMF General Regulation, the AML compliance program and officer system is regarded as an obligation on an ongoing basis, one which has a timing value of a continuous nature. The continuous timing value means that the regulated financial institution should have continuous surveillance of its business environment through automated daily screening against sanction lists worldwide, continuous profiling of risks, and automated transaction monitoring. It does not mean a periodic check, but rather it refers to continuous monitoring without any pause during the whole life cycle of each client relationship in order to stop financial crimes. Even though there are secondary elements with other timelines, such as a 5-year period of retention of documents and an annual cycle of training of staff members, the general structural obligation requires the presence of daily compliance. |
||||
| AML record retention | Retention period 5 years | TRACFIN | source | |
In the French Monetary and Financial Code, the AML record retention structure is categorized entirely under a retention obligation, with a fixed retention period of 5 years. In other words, the regulatory framework specifies that financial institutions have to secure and store all records related to customers' identification (KYC), risks, and transactions in an immutable medium. The retention period of 5 years serves as a retroactive tool, aimed at law enforcement, since the countdown starts at the moment when the account is closed for customer identity or when the transaction is completed. In this way, the obligation enables the preservation of financial records that can be easily accessed by TRACFIN and judicial bodies regardless of GDPR erasure requests. |
||||
| Customer due diligence (KYC/CDD) | At onboarding + ongoing | TRACFIN | source | |
The French Monetary and Financial Code and the AMF General Regulation describe the Customer Due Diligence (KYC/CDD) process as an obligation with a continuous, real-time/daily timing requirement. This regulation requires financial institutions subject to it to maintain constant vigilance, conduct daily automated screenings against asset-freezing lists worldwide, and continue monitoring transaction patterns against the customer's socio-economic profile. It is therefore not a static process but is dynamic, as the process will be ongoing through the life of the relationship with the client. There are structured risk-based timings involved in the KYC process, which range from immediate event triggering for high-risk cases to periodic refreshing of data for a period of between 1 and 5 years, depending on the risk rating of the client. |
||||
| Suspicious transaction reporting | Deadline Event-based | TRACFIN | source | |
According to the French Monetary and Financial Code, the Suspicious Transaction Reporting regime is considered an event-based obligation subject to a rigid timing requirement of immediate / without delay (sans délai). The legal requirement stipulates that once a compliance officer or TRACFIN correspondent becomes certain about the suspicions surrounding the transactions or funds being associated with money laundering, tax fraud, or terrorist financing, the formal declaration of suspicion (déclaration de soupçon) should be made directly to TRACFIN. Unlike the calendar-based obligations, the trigger for the reporting duty arises exclusively from the emergence of a compliance risk or transaction alert. In practice, the report must be made either before conducting the transaction in order for TRACFIN to use its blocking authority, or right after the transaction has been completed if the blocking was not possible. Regardless of which, the rigid requirement of the “tipping-off” prohibition, under which the client cannot be notified, remains in effect. |
||||
| No obligations match these filters. | ||||
Latest news
-
AUSTRAC Examines Western Union AML Controls and Transaction Monitoring
26 Sep 2026
Australia's financial intelligence unit has initiated a formal investigation into Western Union's anti-money laundering framework and compliance infrastructure. The regulatory examination focuses on the company's paymen…
-
RBI penalizes Ola Financial Services for KYC compliance failures
25 Sep 2026
The Reserve Bank of India imposed a monetary penalty of ₹3.10 lakh on Ola Financial Services Private Limited for non-compliance with KYC directions under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. Following a statuto…