Russia

The Bank of Russia removed the company from the microfinance register for repeated violations within a year, specifically failing the minimum own-funds (capital) requirement at 30 June 2026 and 16 August 2026.

The Bank of Russia revoked the banking licence of the Kemerovo non-bank credit institution (reg. No. 2085-Д) because it could not meet its mandatory payments for more than 14 days and its assets were of very low quality. A temporary administration was appointed and the executive bodies' powers were suspended.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to prevent similar violations of the cited provision of the insider-information law. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that the senior trader at ИК ВЕЛЕС Капитал used information on the firm's client orders to trade for his own brokerage account between 16 January 2023 and 29 March 2024 on the Moscow Exchange. It ordered him not to repeat the violation. The release states no fine and does not say the firm itself was sanctioned.

The Bank of Russia removed the cooperative from the credit cooperative register, ending its right to operate, for repeated violations of Law 190-FZ within a year and for failing to carry out binding Bank of Russia orders on time.

The Bank of Russia found that the general director of LLC Kinetik Capital placed offsetting orders between his personal brokerage account and the company's account in the first quarter of 2026, in Sberbank, Sovcombank and Surgutneftegas shares and two OFZ-PD bonds. It issued him a binding order to avoid similar violations, directed intermediaries and exchanges to suspend transactions on his accounts, and passed the information to law enforcement. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia removed the cooperative from the credit cooperative register for repeated violations within a year. It cited an inaccurate register of members as of 20 May and 13 August 2026, incorrectly submitted officer reports in late 2025 and early 2026, and a missed notice of changes in officer data.

The Bank of Russia removed the cooperative from the credit cooperative register for repeated violations within a year, non-compliance with binding Bank of Russia orders, failure to transmit member-register data on time and a breach of the procedure for handling appeals.

The Bank of Russia annulled the company's depositary licence after finding breaches of the requirements of para 7 of Presidential Decree No. 138 (special economic measures on securities circulation). The notice does not describe the specific acts; the deadline to wind down obligations is 9 February 2027.

The Bank of Russia found that its account was used for pre-arranged deals in Sibur Holding and Rostelecom bonds in 2025 that distorted price and volume on the Moscow Exchange. The company was held administratively liable and ordered to avoid similar violations, and transactions on its trading accounts were to be suspended. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that its account was used for pre-arranged deals in Sibur Holding and Rostelecom bonds in 2025 that distorted price and volume on the Moscow Exchange. The company was held administratively liable and ordered to avoid similar violations, and transactions on its trading accounts were to be suspended. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that its account was used for pre-arranged deals in Sibur Holding and Rostelecom bonds in 2025 that distorted price and volume on the Moscow Exchange. The company was held administratively liable and ordered to avoid similar violations, and transactions on its trading accounts were to be suspended. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that he placed orders through the account of Zavod SILACH in pre-arranged deals in Sibur Holding and Rostelecom bonds on the Moscow Exchange in 2025, causing significant deviations in price and trading volume. He was held administratively liable and ordered to avoid similar violations, and transactions on his trading accounts were to be suspended. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that he placed orders through his own brokerage account and the accounts of two companies he co-owns, in pre-arranged deals in Sibur Holding and Rostelecom bonds on the Moscow Exchange in 2025, causing significant deviations in price and trading volume. He was held administratively liable and ordered to avoid similar violations, and transactions on his trading accounts were to be suspended. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia removed the company from the microfinance register for repeated violations within a year: non-compliance with binding Bank of Russia orders, loan-loss reserves set up in breach of the rules, and incorrect calculation of borrowers' debt-burden indicators.

The Bank of Russia removed the company from the microfinance register for repeated violations within a year and for not carrying out binding Bank of Russia orders on time. It also found that the sole executive officer lacked the required management experience and had submitted a foreign education document without proof of recognition in Russia.

The Bank of Russia fined the depositary 5,000,000 roubles for breaching special economic measures in its depositary activities, under the presidential decrees on securities circulation. The notice is headed as an order but its body states a fine, and it gives no separate decision number.

The Bank of Russia annulled the broker, dealer and securities-management licences for repeated securities-law violations and repeated failure to comply with its orders within a year. The breaches cited include own-funds, liquidity and capital-adequacy calculations, reporting, internal accounting and internal control. The licences lapse on 11 November 2026 and client assets must be returned by 10 November 2026.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that she and Konstantin Mikhailov used pump-and-dump and reverse schemes in OGK-2 shares on the Moscow Exchange in 2025, trading over 10,000 times in total, including pre-arranged trades between their accounts. She was held administratively liable and ordered not to repeat the conduct, and intermediaries were told to suspend transactions on her accounts. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that he and Anastasia Mikhailova used pump-and-dump and reverse schemes in OGK-2 shares on the Moscow Exchange in 2025, with over 10,000 trades and some pre-arranged trades between their own accounts. He was held administratively liable and ordered not to repeat the conduct, and intermediaries were told to suspend transactions on his accounts. The release states no fine.

The Bank of Russia revoked the banking licence of the non-bank credit institution (reg. No. 3552-K, Moscow). It cited repeated violations of banking law, breaches of AML/CFT requirements, and failure to report reliable information on mandatory-control operations to the authorised body in time.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that Softline's former Deputy General Director for Asset Management misused insider information in trades in Softline ordinary shares on the Moscow Exchange between 19 and 27 June 2024, selling a large block before a public announcement and buying back the same volume after the price fell. The release mentions no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia revoked the banking licence (reg. No. 2574, Moscow) and the professional securities market licence. It cited repeated violations of banking law, involvement in suspicious transit transactions aimed at moving funds abroad and cashing out, and failure to report suspicious transactions in good time.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia found that an investment adviser at an unnamed bank viewed clients' orders in the bank's system and placed matching opposing orders through his wife's brokerage account on the Moscow Exchange. He was held administratively liable and ordered not to repeat the violation, and intermediaries were told to suspend transactions on his and his wife's brokerage accounts. The release states no fine; the register shows the prescription itself dated 3 March 2026 (doc 49417).

The Bank of Russia annulled the licence of the management company for managing investment funds, unit investment funds and non-state pension funds. The notice says it repeatedly failed within a year to comply with Bank of Russia orders and breached rules on distributing, providing or disclosing information; it does not cite the legal provisions or order numbers.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to prevent similar violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia revoked the licence of the Moscow bank (reg. No. 2932) after repeated violations of banking law and several earlier supervisory measures, including restrictions on certain transactions. It cited very poor loan quality and large volumes of suspicious settlement transactions for a group of clients showing signs of shell companies, and said it had passed information to law enforcement.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.

The Bank of Russia revoked the licence of this Moscow bank (reg. No. 3175) for repeated violations of banking and AML/CFT rules within a year, after several supervisory measures in the previous 12 months. It cited high-risk lending, understated credit risk and large volumes of suspicious client transactions, and said it would send information on suspected unlawful operations to law enforcement.

The Bank of Russia issued the company a binding order to correct violations of the cited provisions of the insider-information law and to prevent similar ones. The notice does not describe the conduct and states no fine.